# Service Monitoring via Hazard Analysis White Paper

> Apply hazard analysis and Critical Control Points (CCPs) to IT monitoring. Improve service reliability, reduce costs, and detect issues before they impact users.

**Overview:**  
This white paper introduces a proactive, hazard-based framework for service monitoring, drawing inspiration from the HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) model widely used in the food industry. Instead of reactive troubleshooting based on generic metrics, this method centers on identifying and monitoring _critical control points_ across IT systems to manage potential hazards before they escalate into service-impacting incidents.

###  **Key Takeaways**

  *  **Industry Challenge:**  
The [2023 Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) Survey](<https://www.cncf.io/reports/cncf-annual-survey-2023/>) shows 90%+ container usage in production; top challenges include security (40%), complexity (36%), and monitoring (35%).
  *  **New Monitoring Lens:**  
Traditional frameworks (e.g., [RED](<https://grafana.com/blog/2018/08/02/the-red-method-how-to-instrument-your-services/>), [USE](<https://www.brendangregg.com/usemethod.html>), and [Google’s Four Golden Signals](<https://sre.google/sre-book/monitoring-distributed-systems/#xref_monitoring_golden-signals>)) fall short in complex systems. This paper proposes a hazard-based alternative that offers more context-aware monitoring.
  *  **Hazard Classes Identified:**
    * Capacity & Resource Utilization
    * Undesirable Effects of Change
    * Hardware Failure
    * Security Events
    * External Dependencies
    * Compliance & Internal SLAs
  *  **Guiding Principles for Indicators:**
    * Indicators must tie to real hazards.
    * Alerts should include user impact and response steps.
    * Visualizations must be consistent, scaled, and well-labeled.
  *  **Efficiency-Driven Metrics:**  
Track CPU, memory, and I/O _per unit of work_ to benchmark performance, compare deployments, and detect anomalies early.
  *  **Change Monitoring:**  
Covers both internal (e.g., hardware config, deployments) and external (e.g., SSL certs, upstream SLAs) environments—ensuring no blind spots.
  *  **Outcome:**  
Enables faster root cause analysis, improved resource planning, and early warning systems—resulting in better service reliability and reduced costs.



 **Download the full white paper below** to explore the framework, real-world examples, and how your team can implement hazard-driven observability.

* * *

##  **Need Help?**

Command Prompt is the world’s oldest dedicated Postgres services and consulting company, offering expert support for performance optimization and troubleshooting. [Contact us today](<https://commandprompt.com/contact-us/>) for Postgres and open source support.

---
[View this page online](https://www.commandprompt.com/blog/service-monitoring-via-hazard-analysis-white-paper/)